Yes, in that case, the change was no more than "extends Filter<T>" -> 
"implements Predicate<T>". No other changes.

You can take a look at what's going on at:

https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/55

and please comment! As a Jena newbie, I need comments. {grin}

---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library

On May 1, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Claude Warren <[email protected]> wrote:

> An example is:
> 
> org.apache.jena.security.utils.RDFListSecFilter
> 
> Which filters results based on user access and is used whereever a RDFList
> (or an iterator on one) is returned .
> 
> Claude
> 
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:12 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Oh, now I think I understand your point better.
>> 
>> Yes, I have already trawled that code and worked over those reusable guys,
>> and yes, you will certainly still be able to combine and reuse Predicates
>> in the same way that you have used Filters. When I get this PR in, you can
>> see some examples of that.
>> 
>> A Java 8 Predicate is just an interface that looks much like Jena's
>> Filter, which can benefit from the -> lamda syntax and which is designed to
>> fit into the Java 8 language APIs (e.g. for use with Streams).
>> 
>> ---
>> A. Soroka
>> The University of Virginia Library
>> 
>> On May 1, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Claude Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> We have a number of places where Filter objects are created and reused
>>> (usueally due to complexity or to reduce the code footprint in terms of
>>> debugging).  Will it still be possible to define these complex filters
>> and
>>> use them in multiple places.
>>> 
>>> The permissions system does this in that it creates a filter for RDFNodes
>>> and then applies them to the 3 elements in a triple to create a single
>>> filter for triples.
>>> 
>>> There are several cases like this.
>>> 
>>> I will have to look at the permissions code to find a concrete example,
>> but
>>> I think this is the case.
>>> 
>>> Claude
>>> 
>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> As for the Filter implementation..... will that be transparant to
>> filter
>>>> implementations?  I assume so.
>>>> 
>>>> I think this was in response to my question about Filter?
>>>> 
>>>> If you mean that things that currently implement Filter (outside of
>> Jena's
>>>> own code) will not be greatly affected, then yes, so I would hope. I
>> will
>>>> @Deprecated Filter and its methods, but that seems to me to be all that
>> is
>>>> needed for this first step.
>>>> 
>>>> I should have a PR with this later today, when you can observe some real
>>>> code and give me feedback.
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> A. Soroka
>>>> The University of Virginia Library
>>>> 
>>>> On May 1, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Claude Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I don't see any reason not to remove the Node functions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As for the Filter implementation..... will that be transparant to
>> filter
>>>>> implementations?  I assume so.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> (mainly for Claude - I did check jena-pemissions and didn't see any
>>>> usage)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There are a bunch of deprecated statics in Node (the correct way is to
>>>> use
>>>>>> NodeFactory)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Node.createAnon()
>>>>>> Node.createAnon(AnonId)
>>>>>> Node.createLiteral(LiteralLabel)
>>>>>> Node.createURI(String)
>>>>>> Node.createVariable(String)
>>>>>> Node.createLiteral(String)
>>>>>> Node.createLiteral(String, String, boolean)
>>>>>> Node.createLiteral(String, String, RDFDatatype)
>>>>>> Node.createLiteral(String, RDFDatatype)
>>>>>> Node.createUncachedLiteral(Object, String, RDFDatatype)
>>>>>> Node.createUncachedLiteral(Object, RDFDatatype)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It looks like they are not used by the jena codebase and are there for
>>>>>> compatibility only.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any reason not to remove them?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      Andy
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
>>>>> <http://like-like.xenei.com>
>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
>>> <http://like-like.xenei.com>
>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> <http://like-like.xenei.com>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Reply via email to