Hi Qihong, As Andy mentioned, the bonding period is for community bonding, not just mentor bonding. I can help you with JavaCC for the project. But much more work needs comments and discussions with others in the community. For example, Andy just pointed out the design issue and the timeline changes. It's required for you to think about it and make revisions accordingly. If any questions, just ask on the mailing list. You'll get answers from the right one, not just from me.
It seems that your JENA-491 branch still uses com.hp.hpl.jena. Have you re-checked out the latest code? Best regards, Ying Jiang On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Qihong, > > One of the reasons there is a community bonding period is to create the > right social context for the work rather than just being about technical > work. As other people may be working on the areas you need to modify, this > will help avoid problems. > > Discussions should be on this list and there has been nothing. Discussions > are also here to help you. It's a large codebase, and some of it quite old. > It makes it hard to see what's important and what's not. > > When it comes to decisions, the Apache catchphrase is "if it isn't on the > list, it does not exist". Given that the Jena development community only > exists via this list, you'll appreciate that this is quite important. > Please discuss with Ying about regular (minimum, weekly) on the list. > > There are some changes to the plan if the javacc work is done first. Alos, > we have discussed a revised design with GRAPH inside the CONSTRUCT template. > Don't forget the case of CONSTRUCT WHERE { } shorthand form. > > What does the timeline look like with these revisions? That changes the > "Week 1 - Week 3" slot. Some of that freed up time should go to announcing > the changes on the users@ list, I suggest just after the mid term > evaluation. > > You will have noticed that the package structure in ARQ has changed. There > is no com.hp.hpl.jena anymore, it's all moved under org.apache.jena. You > are probably better off starting from a clean clone of Jena. > > Andy > > > On 24/05/15 14:12, Qihong Lin wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for my late response. During the community binding period, I >> studied the JavaCC grammar with my mentor's help. Now, I know how to >> use JavaCC in this project. >> A new branch of JENA-491 [1] has just been set up. I'll code there in >> the first place, and finally merge the code into jena master. >> >> In all, I think everything is ready. Let's begin coding! >> >> regards, >> Qihong >> >> [1] https://github.com/confidencesun/jena/tree/JENA-491 >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 05/05/15 11:52, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28/04/15 13:09, Ying Jiang wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> FYI, Google announced the accepted projects of GSoC 2015 yesterday. A >>>>> Jena project of "Extend CONSTRUCT to build quads (JENA-491) [1] is >>>>> among them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Ying Jiang >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KiDlfxMq5ZsU7vj7ZDm10yC96OZgdltwmZAZl56sTw0/edit#heading=h.fwbztdn0y3zl >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> What's the plan for the bonding period? >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>> >>> Ping? >>> >>> >
