That should certainly “enlist” a number of RC testers. {grin}

I will stand by for bug fixes.

---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 3:38 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 23/11/15 15:31, A. Soroka wrote:
>> A weightless +1 from me, of course! {grin} I’m excited to see this stuff get 
>> in front of people.
>> 
>> I’m not sure what you mean by “Fuseki integration”, Andy. Do you mean to 
>> make the new dataset impl available as an option in Fuseki (presumably in 
>> both the web admin UI and the CLI for the standalone server)?
> 
> Fuseki should chnage to using the new in-memory txn dataset when creating new 
> in-memory setups.  So the template-driven assemblers (UI) and from the 
> command line (--mem) will change.  Existing setups are preserved because the 
> template is used to create an assembler when first used, not each start-up.
> 
>       Andy
> 
>> 
>> ---
>> A. Soroka
>> The University of Virginia Library
>> 
>>> On Nov 23, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have:
>>> 
>>> * in-memory transactional dataset from Adam is in the codebase
>>> (details on progress below)
>>> * configurable lucene analyzers
>>> * general maintenance.
>>> * Improved start-up and configuration to wire the jars together.
>>> 
>>> Shall we do a release? This fits our 3-6 months cycle.
>>> 
>>> As we know, getting people to try unreleased builds has limited effect 
>>> (generally for point-bug fixes, less so for new features) so my suggestion 
>>> is to release soon as v3.0.1 and describe the in-memory transactional 
>>> dataset as "RC".  It's not fully integrated (test: Fuseki is not using it 
>>> yet) and getting that done and stable isn't an instant task to do. At the 
>>> same time, a release will let people try it.
>>> 
>>> So we expose the in-memory transactional dataset at the API level now, 
>>> introduce the deprecations so people can see what's coming, and 
>>> complete/stabilize the integration to make a v3.1.0 in a few months time.
>>> 
>>>     Andy
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Progress on the in-memory transactional dataset
>>> https://pony-poc.apache.org/thread.html/Zj36f2pbaszgdnj
>>> 
>>> If you want to try it, then DatasetFactory.createTxnMem() is the entry 
>>> point.
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Outstanding tasks:
>>> * Dependency version management in jena-parent.
>>> 
>>> Done
>>> 
>>> * more testing [done], and the organisation of the tests
>>> 
>>> Test done, organisation of tests is partially done. There is a wider tasks 
>>> to organise the dataset tests we have into some sort of order but that's 
>>> non-blocking.
>>> 
>>> * documentation
>>> * code cleaning for deprecation of DatasetFactory.createMem
>>> * Same migration for DatasetGraphFactory.createMem
>>> * Fuseki integration
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to