[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128405#comment-15128405
]
Osma Suominen edited comment on JENA-1127 at 2/2/16 3:36 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I actually noticed once that in certain cases you get much better performance
with {noformat}"?x :p/:p* ?y"{noformat} than with {noformat}"?x :p+
?y"{noformat}, which surprised me at the time but I forgot to report it and
moved on to other things. I guess this explains that. Thanks for the fix!
was (Author: osma):
I actually noticed once that in certain cases you get much better performance
with "?x :p/:p* ?y" than with "?x :p+ ?y", which surprised me at the time but I
forgot to report it and moved on to other things. I guess this explains that.
Thanks for the fix!
> Improve execution of "?x :p+ ?y"
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1127
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1127
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.1.0
>
>
> We can get a better set of starting nodes by finding subject of {{\:p}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
