[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15611430#comment-15611430 ]
Osma Suominen commented on JENA-1250: ------------------------------------- Lucene 5 seems to bring a new index format: https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_0_0/MIGRATE.html Old indexes either have to be rebuilt or upgraded to the new format using the IndexUpgrader tool, or a separate compatibility module (lucene-backward-codecs.jar) installed. I'm not sure whether it's worth supporting the old index format for jena-text, as it's rather easy to reindex. Lucene 6 brings some API changes: http://lucene.apache.org/core/6_2_1/MIGRATE.html I think it would be easiest to first attempt an upgrade to Lucene 5, and if that goes well, then continue to version 6. In my understanding, jena-text uses relatively few Lucene features in all so most of the API changes are likely irrelevant. But I may be wrong. It would be great if [~jmvanel] - or anyone - could try changing the dependency in the POM just to see what happens. I don't have time for that right now but I can help with sorting out the issues that arise if someone makes a PR. > Upgrade text search to latest Lucene > ------------------------------------ > > Key: JENA-1250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1250 > Project: Apache Jena > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Jena > Reporter: Jean-Marc Vanel > > We are currently at Lucene 4.9.1 , > which is quite outdated compared to latest Lucene, which is 6.2.1 . > Note that there is project to add a simple completion feature in addition to > existing simple search. > But it would be better to do that on an updated Lucene dependency . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)