[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15633396#comment-15633396
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-1233:
---------------------------------
Ideally the {{Writable}} wrappers for those types in the Elephas modules should
also be marked as such. Those types may want to implement specific
serialisation methods so that they still use the binary serialisations defined
for those types. I can try and take a look at this
> Make RDF primitives Serializable
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1233
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1233
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Elephas
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.1.0
> Reporter: Itsuki Toyota
>
> I always use Jena when I handle RDF data with Apache Spark.
> However, when I want to store resulting RDD data (ex. RDD[Triple]) in binary
> format, I can't call RDD.saveAsObjectFile method.
> It's because RDD.saveAsObjectFile requires java.io.Serializable interface.
> See the following code.
> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v1.6.0/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala#L1469
> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v1.6.0/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala#L79-L86
> You can see that
> 1) RDD.saveAsObjectFile calls Util.serialize method
> 2) Util.serialize method requires the RDD-wrapped object implementing
> java.io.Serializable interface. For example, if you want to save a
> RDD[Triple] object, Triple must implements java.io.Serializable.
> So why not implement java.io.Serializable ?
> I think it will improve the usability in Apache Spark.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
