[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15825969#comment-15825969
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1277:
--------------------------------------
Github user osma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/205
@ajs6f I'm not sure whether you can use ORDER BY in a case like this. It
would need a SPARQL function for calculating distances between coordinates, so
you could say, in effect, "order by distance from point (x,y)". This is
something that Lucene can do internally, though.
> Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1277
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Spatial
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.1.1
> Environment: Linux Ubuntu
> Reporter: samur araujo
> Assignee: Osma Suominen
> Attachments: spatial-assembler.ttl
>
>
> I loaded geonames on Jena but the spatial queries take more than 3s to
> execute. The query is below:
> PREFIX spatial: <http://jena.apache.org/spatial#>
> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
> SELECT distinct ?place
> {
> ?place spatial:intersectBox (32.55668 -117.12865 32.56668 -117.13865) .
>
> }
> The data can be downloaded here:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-fwYPJYT1GOYVVIZF9ROUxzclk/view?usp=sharing
> For small datasets the queries are executed in 200ms, very fast. I noticed
> that when I access the lucene index directly the queries are also very fast,
> about 20ms.
> The issue may be related to the pos-processing of lucene results.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
