Okay, I am _finally_ about to send the vote invitation, but I have one last 
question. The votes are normally called for 72 hours, but in this case, that 
would land the end on Saturday night, which is not a great schedule for 
participation. I'm not familiar enough with the the policies to know: is it 
legitimate for me to preemptively extend the deadline to Monday night to ensure 
that we get three complete, solid business days in there?


ajs6f

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> git is your friend!
> 
> On 31/01/17 13:07, A. Soroka wrote:
>> Okay, cool, I'm back on track. Sorry this is taking so long-- first time 
>> jitters!
>> 
>> ajs6f
>> 
>>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 30/01/17 22:03, A. Soroka wrote:
>>>> I'm done a dry run of release now (several times, actually). The
>>>> versions in the release.properties file look good, e.g.:
>>>> 
>>>> project.dev.org.apache.jena\:jena-iri=3.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>> project.rel.org.apache.jena\:jena-cmds=3.2.0
>>>> 
>>>> i.e. all the project.rel versions are 3.2.0 (or Fuseki-appropriate
>>>> versions) and all the project.dev versions are 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT (or
>>>> 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT or 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT for Fuseki).
>>>> 
>>>> BUT, the artifacts in target/ directories don't look right. They all
>>>> have SNAPSHOT versions, e.g. jena-3.2.0-SNAPSHOT-source-release.zip
>>>> or apache-jena-fuseki-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz.
>>>> 
>>>> So the first question is: am I correct to think that this is wrong?
>>>> Those should be the real release versions (3.2.0 or 2.5.0), right?
>>>> And if this is wrong, is there some obvious thing I must have done to
>>>> go off like this? It has been almost a year since I used the Maven
>>>> release plugin, and I honestly remember very little of it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Same for me - target/*SNAPSHOT*
>>> 
>>> The dry run does not modify the pom.xml, or any files in git. It just 
>>> thinks about it and writes "pom.xml.tag" - that should be the pom that 
>>> would be used for real.
>>> 
>>>   Andy
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ajs6f
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to