It's as agnostic as it can be.
SQL databases have their own syntax variations and foibles. This is
captured by the general SQL generation (it only needs SQL-92 level -
creating databases has more variation than queries) with override-able
methods that DB-specific syntax.
In addition, some of the smaller/embedded ones have limitations like not
all join trees are possible. This controlled by turning features one/off.
For MonetDB, it would a good idea to exploit it's novel features which
takes it away from SDB as it is today.
See the codebase for classes with the DB name in them.
Andy
On 18/03/17 23:43, Claude Warren wrote:
I was away for this discussion and don't have an opinion about the closing
of the request but do have a question about SDB. I was under the
impression that SDB was fairly database agnostic and that any DB that
supported SQL would work. Am I mistaken? If SDB is not agnostic what
features are required to make it work?
Claude
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:01 PM, A. Soroka (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-134?page=com.
atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
A. Soroka closed JENA-134.
--------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
Support for MonetDB
-------------------
Key: JENA-134
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-134
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SDB
Reporter: ultan ocarroll
Priority: Minor
Labels: column, jdbc, storage
Attachments: SDB-1.3.4_MonetDB_patch.txt
Add support for normalized storage in SDB for MonetDB -
http://www.monetdb.org/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
