> I’m not sure that it is necessarily safe to stop shading Guava. It is a > widely used library with poor compatibility between versions and our users > may experience Version conflicts in other environments.
I've not got a good notion right now of how heavy our dependency is on Guava (although I know I have increased it myself by using it various places!) Does it seem (for the long term) worth investigating the possibilities of moving off Guava entirely? --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Mar 31, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes that would be a good idea > > You should just be able to change a single property and see if it Will > compile. See the instructions on the website: > > http://jena.apache.org/documentation/hadoop/artifacts.html > > Rob > > On 31/03/2017 13:57, "A. Soroka" <[email protected]> wrote: > > So for next steps, should someone (aka me) try to build against a 3.X > Hadoop to see where the jolts are? Does that make sense as a way to gather > more info? I would just go ahead and do it, but lacking (as I do) any Hadoop > dev experience, I want to make sure that it's a good idea before investing > time. > > --- > A. Soroka > The University of Virginia Library > >> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:11 AM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My impression is that 3.0 is still a long way off a generally available >> release since they are still in Alpha at the moment. >> >> I would expect that 2.x would remain the primary distribution for a while >> yet. >> >> I don’t know how much, If at all, map/reduce has changed so it may already >> be possible to build Elephas against 3.X without any changes but then again >> it might not. >> >> I’m not sure that it is necessarily safe to stop shading Guava. It is a >> widely used library with poor compatibility between versions and our users >> may experience Version conflicts in other environments. >> >> Rob >> >> On 29/03/2017 00:18, "Bruno P. Kinoshita" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I would think we could go with a minor version for this, no? Or is >> Elephas such a big part of our offering that we need to make a major >> release to move with Hadoop...? >> >> >> I would think the same. Unless we have other important features to be >> released, maybe something that breaks backward compatibility, etc. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: A. Soroka <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, 29 March 2017 3:20 AM >> Subject: Re: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-10101) Update guava dependency to >> the latest version >> >> >> >>> * Jena would have to move in step with Hadoop and drop support for older >>> versions. >> >> Maybe we can see what Hadoop itself ends up doing for this problem... they >> are targeting their own major release 3 for this. I would think we could go >> with a minor version for this, no? Or is Elephas such a big part of our >> offering that we need to make a major release to move with Hadoop...? >> >> --- >> A. Soroka >> The University of Virginia Library >> >> >>> On Mar 25, 2017, at 7:15 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Step 1: upgrade jena-shaded-guava to v21.0 >>> >>> and see if it works. >>> >>> >>> There are at least two considerations: >>> >>> * Jena would have to move in step with Hadoop >>> and drop support for older versions. >>> * Our downstream users may have guava version choices. >>> >>> and we have to wait until a Hadoop release to remove it. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> On 25/03/17 01:22, A. Soroka wrote: >>>> Looks like Hadoop has successfully updated their Guava dependency-- this >>>> might provide us the opportunity to stop shading Guava. (yay!) >>>> >>>> --- >>>> A. Soroka >>>> The University of Virginia Library >>>> >>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>> >>>>> From: "Tsuyoshi Ozawa (JIRA)" <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-10101) Update guava dependency to the >>>>> latest version >>>>> Date: March 24, 2017 at 9:18:42 PM EDT >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [ >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >>>>> ] >>>>> >>>>> Tsuyoshi Ozawa updated HADOOP-10101: >>>>> ------------------------------------ >>>>> Resolution: Fixed >>>>> Fix Version/s: 3.0.0-alpha3 >>>>> Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) >>>>> >>>>> Committed this to trunk. Thanks Nicholas and Steve for your review, and >>>>> thanks people who joined this issue for your comments. >>>>> >>>>>> Update guava dependency to the latest version >>>>>> --------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Key: HADOOP-10101 >>>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10101 >>>>>> Project: Hadoop Common >>>>>> Issue Type: Improvement >>>>>> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2 >>>>>> Reporter: Rakesh R >>>>>> Assignee: Tsuyoshi Ozawa >>>>>> Labels: BB2015-05-TBR >>>>>> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha3 >>>>>> >>>>>> Attachments: HADOOP-10101-002.patch, HADOOP-10101-004.patch, >>>>>> HADOOP-10101-005.patch, HADOOP-10101-006.patch, HADOOP-10101-007.patch, >>>>>> HADOOP-10101-008.patch, HADOOP-10101-009.patch, HADOOP-10101-009.patch, >>>>>> HADOOP-10101-010.patch, HADOOP-10101-010.patch, HADOOP-10101-011.patch, >>>>>> HADOOP-10101.012.patch, HADOOP-10101.013.patch, HADOOP-10101.014.patch, >>>>>> HADOOP-10101.015.patch, HADOOP-10101.016.patch, HADOOP-10101.017.patch, >>>>>> HADOOP-10101.018.patch, HADOOP-10101.patch, HADOOP-10101.patch >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The existing guava version is 11.0.2 which is quite old. This issue >>>>>> tries to update the version to as latest version as possible. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >>>>> (v6.3.15#6346) >>>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
