[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15953277#comment-15953277
 ] 

Osma Suominen commented on JENA-1313:
-------------------------------------

[~andy.seaborne] The discussion lately has been around implementing collation 
as an ARQ extension function and leaving the default ARQ sorting (and 
comparison) operations unchanged. Other than that, your summary looks accurate 
to me.

Wearing my application developer hat, I don't really care which way this is 
implemented (changing the defaults vs. extension function) as long as it is 
possible to do locale-aware collation.

> Language-specific collation in ARQ
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1313
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1313
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ARQ
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.2.0
>            Reporter: Osma Suominen
>
> As [discussed|http://markmail.org/message/v2bvsnsza5ksl2cv] on the users 
> mailing list in October 2016, I would like to change ARQ collation of literal 
> values to be language-aware and respect language-specific collation rules.
> This would probably involve changing at least the 
> [NodeUtils.compareLiteralsBySyntax|https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/util/NodeUtils.java#L199]
>  method.
> It currently sorts by lexical value first, then by language tag. Since the 
> collation order needs to be stable across all possible literal values, I 
> think the safest way would be to sort by language tag first, then by lexical 
> value according to the collation rules for that language.
> But what about subtags like {{@en-US}} or {{@pt-BR}}? Can they have different 
> collation rules than the main language? It would be a bit strange if all 
> {{@en-US}} literals sorted after {{@en}} literals...
> It would be good to check how Dydra does this and possibly take the same 
> approach. See the message linked above for further backgound.
> I've been talking with [~kinow] about this and he may be interested in 
> implementing it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to