(triggered by the question on users@ about RDFConnection and HttpClient
=> JENA-1330)
Q:
For API operations that take an HttpClient argument, should there always
be a variant that accepts an HttpClient and a HttpContext?
From looking at the code, there is also a possible HttpContext to apply
to use of HttpClient. It means one HttpClient can be reused in different
ways with different HttpContexts.
Also (OK - this is a second question :-)
HttpClientContext seems to be a wrapper of an HttpContext to provide
convenient names and typesafe operations on an existing HttpContext.
If so, HttpQuery (etc) should have a HttpContext, not a
HttpClientContext, and adapt the HttpContext at the point of applying
operations?
Andy
