[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16008924#comment-16008924
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1313:
--------------------------------------
Github user kinow commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/237#discussion_r116342234
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/expr/nodevalue/NodeValueSortKey.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.jena.sparql.expr.nodevalue;
+
+import org.apache.jena.graph.Node;
+import org.apache.jena.graph.NodeFactory;
+import org.apache.jena.sparql.expr.NodeValue;
+import org.apache.jena.sparql.util.FmtUtils;
+
+/**
+ * A {@link NodeValue} that supports collation value for a string. This
allows query values
+ * to be sorted following rules for a specific collation.
+ */
+public class NodeValueSortKey extends NodeValue {
+
+ /**
+ * Node value text.
+ */
+ private final String string;
+ /**
+ * Node value collation language tag (e.g. fi, pt-BR, en, en-CA, etc).
+ */
+ private final String collation;
+
+ public NodeValueSortKey(final String string, final String collation) {
+ this.string = string;
+ this.collation = collation;
+ }
+
+ public NodeValueSortKey(final String string, final String collation,
Node n) {
+ super(n);
+ this.string = string;
+ this.collation = collation;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public boolean isSortKey() {
+ return Boolean.TRUE;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public String getString() {
+ return string;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public String asString() {
+ return string;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public String getCollation() {
+ return collation;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ protected Node makeNode() {
+ return NodeFactory.createLiteral(string);
+ }
+
--- End diff --
Added a simple comment, not sure if good enough. Also marked `NodeSortKey`
as final for now to show users it is not supposed to be extended yet, and must
be treated as for internal use only.
> Language-specific collation in ARQ
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1313
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ARQ
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.2.0
> Reporter: Osma Suominen
>
> As [discussed|http://markmail.org/message/v2bvsnsza5ksl2cv] on the users
> mailing list in October 2016, I would like to change ARQ collation of literal
> values to be language-aware and respect language-specific collation rules.
> This would probably involve changing at least the
> [NodeUtils.compareLiteralsBySyntax|https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/util/NodeUtils.java#L199]
> method.
> It currently sorts by lexical value first, then by language tag. Since the
> collation order needs to be stable across all possible literal values, I
> think the safest way would be to sort by language tag first, then by lexical
> value according to the collation rules for that language.
> But what about subtags like {{@en-US}} or {{@pt-BR}}? Can they have different
> collation rules than the main language? It would be a bit strange if all
> {{@en-US}} literals sorted after {{@en}} literals...
> It would be good to check how Dydra does this and possibly take the same
> approach. See the message linked above for further backgound.
> I've been talking with [~kinow] about this and he may be interested in
> implementing it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
