Andy Seaborne kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 17:59:
Process : if we all agree with some text, then shoudl we email it to
semantic-web@w3? I'd prefer if it wasn't me sending it to show it's the
PMC.
I'm fine with any recent version of the text.
I'm neutral to that - I didn't want the message to be too much about the
specific paper - it's an MSc piece of work, researcher in training.
I am annoyed by the revision of dates to July/2017 (while the work was
done in 2015, it's not the first thing you come across). That in itself
is poor.
It's standard practice to include "last retrieved" dates for URL
references in papers, in case the web site dies or changes substantially
after the paper was written. As already pointed out, they probably just
bumped the date when submitting the paper to indicate that they
re-checked the Jena site and it was still there. Unfortunately, since
the URL was for the Jena project and they mention a specific (older)
Jena release, the result is confusing.
The reference could have been formulated better, but it's not wrong.
We don't say "report in public". That's for discussion.
Right.
This work isn't new - it's 2015 reworked. So even by the argument of
secret, they could have done something.
True, they could at least have contacted the project after the original
paper/thesis was published.
-Osma
--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
[email protected]
http://www.nationallibrary.fi
