They have set the heap size wrong.
Andy
On 25/10/17 14:21, Rob Vesse wrote:
“However, no integrated benchmark-independent execution framework for these
benchmarks has yet been provided.”
My 2012 self is somewhat disappointed :(
https://github.com/rvesse/sparql-query-bm
Rob
On 25/10/2017 14:08, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
https://iswc2017.semanticweb.org/paper-70/
is a paper in the main conference track at ISWC. It is exercising Jena 2.3.0, but I'm not sure if that version number is
for Jena/TDB or Fuseki. It is using Java 7, which makes me think they mean
Fuseki 2.3.0 (Jena/TDB 3.0.0), which is still
considerably out of date. Same story, different day...
--
ajs6f
