I'm basically +1 to this-- jena-project was always confusing at best. In theory, we could factor out some of those 932 lines with a Jena Maven BOM. Actually, that might be nice for integrators and those using apache-jena-lib.
ajs6f > On Nov 17, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > When we moved to one version for all modules, pressure of time pushed us to > have jena-project as a copy of the old jena-parent. > > Do we want to go the next step forward which is to merge jena-project into > the top POM and drop the jena-project module? > > It turns out to be quite easy to do. > > PR for discussion: > https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/312 > > It does make the top POM quite large - 932 lines. > > Thoughts? > > Andy
