[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16276865#comment-16276865
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1440:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 52a9f02b94ebc351a17b6da16074a7b98e38d99a in jena's branch
refs/heads/master from [~andy.seaborne]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=52a9f02 ]
JENA-1440: Merge commit 'refs/pull/317/head' of github.com:apache/jena
This closes #317.
> Map ByteBuffer direct to NodeIds, avoiding a Record object (TupleIndexRecord)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1440
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: TDB2
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.5.0, Jena 3.6.0
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.6.0
>
>
> Avoiding going {{bytes-> Record->Tuple<NodeId>}} can save about 25% of time
> in a large index scan (but there are lots of other things going on in a
> typical query and this change would be negligible).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
