[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16388486#comment-16388486
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1454:
--------------------------------------
Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/373#discussion_r172649522
--- Diff:
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/servlets/ResponseResultSet.java
---
@@ -131,26 +130,30 @@ public static void doResponseResultSet(HttpAction
action, ResultSet resultSet, P
contentType = contentTypeTextPlain ;
// Some kind of general dispatch is neater but there are quite a
few special cases.
+ // text/plain is special because there is no ResultSetWriter for
it (yet).
+ // Text plain is special because of the formatting by prologue.
+ // text/plain is not a registered result set language.
//
// JSON is special because of ?callback
- //
+ //
// XML is special because of
// (1) charset is a feature of XML, not the response
// (2) ?stylesheet=
//
// Thrift is special because
// (1) charset is meaningless
// (2) there is no boolean result form.
- //
- // Text plain is special because of the formatting by prologue.
-
+
+ if ( Objects.equals(serializationType, contentTypeTextPlain) ) {
--- End diff --
Just out of curiosity-- why `Objects.equals` here instead of
`contentTypeTextPlain.equals` or `serializationType.equals`?
> Configurable ResultSet reading and writing
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1454
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1454
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 3.7.0
>
>
> Same patterns as {{RDFParser}}, {{RDFWriter}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
