+1! ajs6f
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Claude Warren <cla...@xenei.com> wrote: > > This looks like a prime candidate for a contract test (as soon as we agree > on what the action should be) > > Claude > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:26 PM, A. Soroka (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page= >> com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- >> tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16389757#comment-16389757 ] >> >> A. Soroka commented on JENA-1499: >> --------------------------------- >> >> [~andy.seaborne], >> {{org.apache.jena.sparql.core.mem.QuadTableForm.GSPO.listGraphNodes()}} >> is just taking the keys of the GSPO index and returning a stream of them. >> That's why (see above) if there are mappings fro{{m }}{{Node => Node => >> Set<Node>}} with that {{Set}} empty, we're still seeing names of graphs >> appear at that exact method. >> >>> The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all >> quads. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> -------------- >>> >>> Key: JENA-1499 >>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499 >>> Project: Apache Jena >>> Issue Type: Bug >>> Affects Versions: Jena 3.6.0 >>> Reporter: Andy Seaborne >>> Priority: Major >>> >>> Illustration: >>> {noformat} >>> DatasetGraph dsg = DatasetGraphFactory.createTxnMem(); >>> Quad q = SSE.parseQuad("(:g :s :p :o)"); >>> dsg.add(q); >>> dsg.delete(q); >>> Iter.print(dsg.listGraphNodes()); >>> {noformat} >>> prints {{http://example/g}}. >> >> >> >> -- >> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >> (v7.6.3#76005) >> > > > > -- > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web > <http://like-like.xenei.com> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
