[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16394118#comment-16394118
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1480:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user afs opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/380

    JENA-1480: Use $.getJSON(url,data)

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/afs/jena jena-1480-strict-urls

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/380.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #380
    
----
commit 0547e9786478a7cd2acb7d3c292b43e2f32ecbe7
Author: Andy Seaborne <andy@...>
Date:   2018-03-10T09:52:42Z

    JENA-1480: Use $.getJSON(url,data)

----


> Bad Request 400 returned when clicking "count triples in all graphs" in 
> Fuseki info
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1480
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1480
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Fuseki
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.7.0
>            Reporter: David Cook
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: error.html
>
>
> When I click "count triples in all graphs", the UI doesn't change and I see 
> the following in the Chrome console:
> {noformat}
> GET 
> <FUSEKI_URL>/query?query=select%20(count(*)%20as%20?count)%20\{?s%20?p%20?o}
> 400 (Bad Request)
> jquery-1.10.2.min.js:6
> {noformat}
> I've experienced this in Fuseki 2.6.0 when using the WAR too. I'm also using 
> the "tdb:unionDefaultGraph true" configuration setting.
> I've used someone else's install of Fuseki 2.5.0 and it works for them. I 
> don't think they're using "tdb:unionDefaultGraph true", and I'm not sure if 
> they're using the WAR or a standalone. Since there is no Server: 
> Apache-Coyote response header, I'm guessing they're using the standalone. I 
> don't know if that would make a difference. 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to