Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/440#discussion_r198545901
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/syntax/TestSSE_Builder.java ---
@@ -233,4 +249,42 @@ public void testBuildExpr_14() {
"(!= ?x ?y)") ;
}
+ @Test
+ public void testBuildTable_01() {
+ Op expected = OpTable.unit();
+ Op actual = SSE.parseOp("(table unit)");
+ assertEquals(expected, actual);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testBuildTable_02() {
+ Op expected = OpTable.empty();
+ Op actual = SSE.parseOp("(table empty)");
+ assertEquals(expected, actual);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testBuildTable_03() {
+ Op expected = OpTable.create(TableFactory.create(Var.alloc("x"),
NodeConst.nodeTrue));
+ Op actual = SSE.parseOp("(table (vars ?x) (row (?x true)))");
+ assertEquals(expected, actual);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testBuildTable_04() {
+ // Can't test for equality because can't create a BNode in a way
that equality will
+ // succeed because OpTable does strict equality and ignores
NodeIsomorphismMap
+ SSE.parseOp("(table (vars ?x) (row (?x _:test)))");
+ }
+
+ @Test(expected = ExprBuildException.class)
--- End diff --
Apparently it's because we extend `TestCase` so JUnit assumes a JUnit 3.8
test which doesn't support expected, adding `@RunWith(JUnit4.class)` to the
test class resolves this
See https://stackoverflow.com/a/50867198/107591
---
