Fuseki1 and SDB distribution building removed.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1571 -- SDB

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1573 -- Fuseki1.

Anyone can get the necessary jars files from maven central tif they want to keep their installations up-to-date and they don't use a dependency manager.

    Andy

Names on my commits may be wrong but it only impacts the JIRA comment, the git commit itself is correct.

Logged with INFRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15850


On 03/07/18 18:36, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The LICENSE and NOTICE files can be tided up. They were setup so individual modules can be released by themselves but Jena now releases all modules at once.

So the L&N can be reduced to:

* One (of each) in the root of the source repo.

* One per distribution binary where the binary includes things not in the repo (but linked to by maven).

* One in each jar. The automatically generated one probably isn't good enough. What I don't know is whether it can be the top-level one or per module (which does rather infer with the tidying up exercise).

Dist areas:
+ apache-jena/dist
+ apache-jena-osgi/dist
+ jena-fuseki2/apache-jena-fuseki/dist/
+ jena-fuseki1/dist/

We could drop the Fuseki1 distribution and just make the server jar.  It needs L&N to reflect the included dependencies.

Consequences:

* Javascript means source in the repo so all the MIT license refs need mentioning in the top level.

     Andy

JENA-1572 has my assessment of all the current L&N files.
JENA-1571 removes the dist/ and assembly for jena-sdb.

Reply via email to