[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16816542#comment-16816542
 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1695:
-------------------------------------

Excellent!

To cope with dependency order, TIM2 can register a function during Jena init so 
DatasetGraaahFactory works as at present for applications. There is some better 
prefix handling as well `PrefixMapI` - a replacement (?) for `PrefixMap` 
because I think basing around `IRI` has not proven to be a good idea for these 
lower level internal storage abstractions. 

`jena-db-storage` can evolve as well.  Maybe abstractions need improving or 
common functionality provided.


> Refactory database storage for TDB2.
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1695
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DBOE
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.11.0
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Jena 3.12.0
>
>
> This ticket is for a new module (provisionally called "jena-db-storage") that 
> is a framework for building RDF databases. It abstracts the database in to 
> "triples+quads", "prefixes" and transactional control.
> {noformat}
> public interface DatabaseRDF  {
>     // Triples and Quads
>     public StorageRDF getData();
>     // Prefixes
>     public StoragePrefixes getPrefixes();
>     //Transactional} for this database.
>     public Transactional getTransactional();
> }
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to