Hi All,
When building the source from the EDT (GMT -4) timezone, I get test
failures in the o.a.j.sparql.expr.TestFunctions:localDateTime_2 test.
Basically, the test is expecting the timezone value to be > -1, which would
be fine for about half of the world, but that value could range anywhere
from -14 * 60 to 14 * 60. In EDT, the value is -240, which doesn't pass the
`> -1` test

Aaron




On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 7:37 AM Bruno P. Kinoshita
<[email protected]> wrote:

>          [ x ] +1 Approve the release
>
> Built on Linux with `mvn clean install -Pdev` using:
>
> Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;
> 2018-06-18T06:33:14+12:00)
> Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.4
> Java version: 1.8.0_191, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
> Default locale: en_NZ, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "linux", version: "4.15.0-47-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
> "unix"
>
>
> + does everything work on Linux?
> Yes
> +does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
> Yes
> ThanksBruno
>
>     On Saturday, 20 April 2019, 7:40:00 am NZST, Andy Seaborne <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.11.0.
> This is the first proposed release candidate.
>
> The deadline for the vote is Tuesday, 23rd April, 2019 at 17:00 UTC
>
> ==== Release changes:
>
> 37 JIRA:
>
> https://s.apache.org/jena-3.11.0-jira
>
> == Changes of note:
>
> JENA-1691 : Metric services for Fuseki
>     Sean Ryan
>
> JENA-1664, JENA-1665, JENA-1673
> SDB improvements including performance of OPTIONAL, MINUS
>     Graham Triggs
>
> JENA-1686
> Set Dyadic#getL() and Dyadic#getR() return type to Graph
>   Jan Martin Keil
>
> JENA-1674 : Fix mishandling negative xsd:floats in TDB2
>
> JENA-1644 : ParameterizedSparqlString Empty List fix
>   Greg Albiston
>
> Improvements to TDB1 and TDB2 handling bad I/O
> during transaction commit.
>
> == Updates
>
> commons compress 1.17 -> 1.18
> libthrift 0.10.0 -> 0.12.0
> jsonld-java 0.12.1 -> 0.12.3
>     Additionally, control the version of Jackson: 2.9.8 due to CVE's
> fileupload 1.3.3 -> 1.4
> slf4j -> 1.7.25 -> 1.7.26 (CVE upgrade)
>
> new:
> io.micrometer: 1.1.3
> and recursive dependencies:
>     org.hdrhistogram:HdrHistogram:jar:2.1.9 (BSD-2-Clause)
>     org.latencyutils:LatencyUtils:jar:2.0.3 (BSD-2-Clause)
>
> ==== Release Vote
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> Please download and test the proposed release.
>
> Staging repository:
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1029
>
> Proposed dist/ area:
>       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>
> Keys:
>       https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git commit (browser URL):
>       https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/4b2f7f32c041
>
> Git Commit Hash:
>       4b2f7f32c0410cca6636b58a89b51d5eb56f247e
>
> Git Commit Tag:
>       jena-3.11.0
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
>         [ ] +1 Approve the release
>         [ ]  0 Don't care
>         [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open until at least
>
>         Tuesday, 23rd April, 2019 at 17:00 UTC
>
> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
> and we can extend the vote period.
>
> Thanks,
>
>       Andy
>
> Checking needed:
>
> + does everything work on Linux?
> + does everything work on MS Windows?
> + does everything work on OS X?
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
>
> + can the source archive really be built?
>           (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>           (both source and binary artifacts)?
> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>

Reply via email to