Hi,

Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.

The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

==== Release changes:

The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL modules.

The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:

https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE

Other JIRA:
https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira

== Updates

JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)

==== Release Vote

Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.

Staging repository:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031

Proposed dist/ area:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/

Keys:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS

Git commit (browser URL):
  https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9

Git Commit Hash:
  d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd

Git Commit Tag:
  jena-3.12.0

Please vote to approve this release:

        [ ] +1 Approve the release
        [ ]  0 Don't care
        [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open until at least

        Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.

Thanks,

      Andy

Checking needed:

+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?

+ can the source archive really be built?
          (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
          (both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
           if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?

Reply via email to