Hello everyone, now that you released the first version with support for GeoSPARQL, you might also be interested in
- running Jena on a new benchmark system called Geographica 2 [1] - as well as check for feature support compared to other systems (Table 1 in the paper [2]) Might be a good idea to mention on the Jena website which of those features are also possible with Jena? And maybe even planned for future work? Regarding running the benchmark, I don't know how much time and effort it takes to setup and run the benchmark. Moreover, it might also worth to let the authors know that there is another system now with GeoSPARQL support given that I assume they might re-run their benchmark in the future and update their benchmark results page > In future work, we plan to include in the bench- > mark the newest Virtuoso version which offers some > GeoSPARQL features; we have not been able to do it > in this version due to problems with the current imple- > mentation as we discussed in Section 4.2. By the way, looking at the benchmark results, except for Strabon system, the Spatial join performance looks horrible. I know all of those things are time costly, but nevertheless I wanted to let you know of this system/paper which I spotted quite recently. Some of you might indeed already be aware of it. Cheers, Lorenz [1] http://geographica2.di.uoa.gr/ [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01933 -- Lorenz Bühmann AKSW group, University of Leipzig Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
