[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16917894#comment-16917894
]
Timo Homburg commented on JENA-1740:
------------------------------------
I understand. If the literals are accessed that often it might prove not
feasible to store the whole image in the triple store.
Considering this, I think the hash value would be a good idea.
Would you also recommend this for textual raster data formats such as
CoverageJSON or GMLCOV or did you only have raster image formats such as
GEOTIFF and the likes in mind?
I wonder if the textual formats would provide a similar challenge to the triple
store if they were to be cached like the GeoSPARQL WKT literals
> Extending Apache Jena with more geospatial functions
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1740
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1740
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Timo Homburg
> Priority: Minor
>
> Hello,
> I am the developer of a project which I named postgis-jena
> (https://github.com/i3mainz/postgis-jena), originally aimed at extending
> JenaARQ with query functions common in databases such as POSTGIS but now
> going beyond that approach and also integrating support for raster data
> (still WIP). I am building up work being done by Greg Albistons extension
> geosparql-jena.
> Is this extension of interest for Apache Jena as a plugin or in another
> context?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)
