[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16953861#comment-16953861
]
Damien Obrist commented on JENA-1769:
-------------------------------------
[~andy] thanks for the information and for looking into this!
I tested using a sample dataset that I had created for a previous issue,
JENA-1619. The dataset is contained in the attachment in that issue
({{jena-transaction-exception-master.zip}}), inside the {{sample-data}} folder.
It consists of 1'000'000 dummy quads of the form
{noformat}
<http://www.test.com/826449> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
<http://www.test.com/number> <http://www.test.com/numbers>
{noformat}
> Dataset#listNames slow for large TDB2 datasets
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1769
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1769
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TDB2
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.13.0
> Reporter: Damien Obrist
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Major
> Labels: performance
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> With Jena 3.13.0, the running time of {{Dataset#listNames}} has increased
> significantly for TDB2 datasets.
> I have compared the running times for a sample TDB2 dataset containing
> *1'000'000 triples*. I have observed a running time of *~270ms* with Jena
> 3.12.0 and *~13.5s* with Jena 3.13.0.
> We're using a dataset with many millions of triples and for our use case, the
> running time has increased from seconds to minutes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
