[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025719#comment-17025719
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1830:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 8fcaac0c902ea434a20c585abd108ecc952c9cfe in jena's branch
refs/heads/master from Andy Seaborne
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=8fcaac0 ]
JENA-1830: Put LTS in default travis-ci setup
> travis.yml
> ----------
>
> Key: JENA-1830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1830
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Jena has several JVM versions in the Travis setup. In addition, the Jenkins
> server has full build and test runs.
> I use Travis (free option) to verify development changes but the build
> process is not perfect. A complete cycle is 5 travis builds and if any one
> fails, the job is flagged in error. The errors are not Jena related - they
> are build environment issues reflected as maven build problems.
> In the last 50 jobs without development failures, I got 24 green, 22 failed
> one or two jobs and 4 build system fails. So I get 40% false reports of code
> failures.
> The individual fails were distributed as:
> Java8 : 3
> Java9 : 3
> Java10: 4
> Java11: 2
> Java12: 10
> The problem is that with 5 fairly reliable jobs, the probablity of a "failed"
> build is increased. This is semi-interactive feedback, unlike Jenkins which
> is a daily set of builds.
> I propose having LTS (8,11, and soon 14).
> Jenkins will provide the more complete testing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
