I am finding some conversion issues around boxes and <code>

https://jena.apache.org/tutorials/rdf_api.html#ch-Statements
vs
http://jena.roylenferink.nl/tutorials/rdf_api.html#ch-Statements

The example is doubly boxed and the fint size keeps jumping.

Yes, the Jena site markup is a bit yuk - it is a conversion itself - but we have the content we have.

There are changes around whitespace and tables. sometimes better, sometimes not. And I have seen an odd "Title" change where ":" becomes "-"

    Andy

On 15/02/2020 13:28, Roy Lenferink wrote:
Hi Jena community,

I noticed Jena is still serving its site from SVN with help of the Apache CMS. 
At the Apache Celix
project we decided to move away from the CMS and move towards git for serving 
our website [1].
This because the CMS was introduced in 2010 and is currently not accepting any 
new projects. With
the move to Hugo we're sure that we still can update the site when the ASF CMS 
will be
decommissioned.

The master branch contains the actual website sources whereas the generated 
website is served
from the asf-site branch. Hugo is being used as static website generator. 
Content is written in
Markdown.

I had a look at Jena its site and it was quite easy to migrate Jena its site to 
use Hugo as well. An
example of Hugo its output is (for demo purposes only) available on [2]. These 
are the existing
markdown files with a slightly changed header.

Moving to git can enlarge the visibility of how projects are functioning. Next 
to that, new contributors
can simply create a pull request against the website repository if they find 
anything they want to
improve. I've updated the 'Improve this page' to 'Edit this page' which will 
open the GitHub webpage
to edit the currently viewed page (currently returning a 404 because the 
apache/jena-site repository
does not exist).

If the community is interested in this move what I propose:
- Someone from the PMC to request a new git repository for the website (e.g. 
jena-site) via [4]
- Me creating the pull request from the repository I am temporarily using for 
the website contents [5]
to the official jena-site repository
- Create a Jenkins job to automatically build the site after changes happen on 
the master branch.
- When the pull request is reviewed and merged ask INFRA to move over from the 
current svnpubsub
to the gitpubsub approach and remove Jena from the Apache CMS.

Next to that Jena is also providing javadocs on its site. My proposal for this 
is to serve them from a
separate branch (e.g. release-docs). This way people who only want to clone the 
site can clone the
the master branch using --single-branch and will not be bothered with cloning 
all the javadocs.

All the URLs are still the same so the SEO score is not influenced in any way.

I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on this :)

Best regards,
Roy

[1] https://github.com/apache/celix-site
[2] http://jena.roylenferink.nl/
[3] http://celix.apache.org/contributing/releasing.html
[4] https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html
[5] https://github.com/rlenferink/jena-site

Reply via email to