With the same interpretation, +1, and thanks very much to Roy for looking into this!
ajs6f > On Feb 21, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > Interpreting as a general "in principle" to move website content ... no > timeline and (obviously) subject to new information becoming available. > > +1 > > PMC - please vote and not leave to LAZY to indicate you are aware this is > work-in-progress. > > Andy > > On 19/02/2020 13:41, Roy Lenferink wrote: >> Hi Jena community, >> After last weeks proposal [1] I'd like to start a vote for moving over from >> the current Apache CMS >> (and SVN) to use Hugo and git :) >> Short recap about Hugo: Hugo is a static site generator which is already >> having more stars on >> GitHub than Jekyll. It is easy to get started with (single static binary >> without dependencies) and it is >> really doing well performance wise. >> [ ] +1 for moving over from the Apache CMS / SVN to Hugo / Git. >> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion on this >> [ ] -1 for not moving over, in this case please explain why >> This vote will be open for the usual 72 hour period. Lazy consensus applies: >> if no -1 votes are being >> cast within the voting period, the vote passes. >> Best regards, >> Roy >> [1] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1a46369ea6e9df4f0b0971934563b9e8433cb33fe42290240969bbe0%40%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E
