[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lorenz Bühmann updated JENA-2107:
---------------------------------
Description:
the following graph pattern is not evaluated efficiently (results in full-scan
per binding) because the second triple pattern doesn't take advantage of the
bindings generated by evaluation of the first one:
{code}
?s <p> ?o .
<< ?s <p> ?o >> <p2> ?v .
{code}
A possible fix would be to adapt the method `rdfStarTripleSub` in class
[SolverRX3.java|https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/2efff8a00b4ffa82751cf46c8a3fed84b6ff3090/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/engine/main/solver/SolverRX3.java#L63-L71]
by changing the beginning to
{code:java}
private static Iterator<Binding> rdfStarTripleSub(Binding input, Triple
xPattern, ExecutionContext execCxt) {
Triple tPattern = Substitute.substitute(xPattern, input);
{code}
We went from 75s for a very small dataset (50k triples) to near instant
response times.
was:
the following graph pattern is not evaluated efficiently (results in full-scan
per binding) because the second triple pattern doesn't take advantage of the
bindings generated by evaluation of the first one:
{code:java}
?s <p> ?o .
<< ?s <p> ?o >> <p2> ?v .
{code}
A possible fix would be to adapt the method `rdfStarTripleSub` in class
[SolverRX3.java|https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/2efff8a00b4ffa82751cf46c8a3fed84b6ff3090/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/engine/main/solver/SolverRX3.java#L63-L71]
by changing the beginning to
{code:java}
private static Iterator<Binding> rdfStarTripleSub(Binding input, Triple
xPattern, ExecutionContext execCxt) {
Triple tPattern = Substitute.substitute(xPattern, input);
{code}
We went from 75s for a very small dataset (50k triples) to near instant
response times.
> RDF Star performance issue with non-concrete node triples
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-2107
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2107
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ARQ
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.17.0, Jena 4.0.0
> Reporter: Lorenz Bühmann
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: Jena 4.1.0
>
>
> the following graph pattern is not evaluated efficiently (results in
> full-scan per binding) because the second triple pattern doesn't take
> advantage of the bindings generated by evaluation of the first one:
> {code}
> ?s <p> ?o .
> << ?s <p> ?o >> <p2> ?v .
> {code}
> A possible fix would be to adapt the method `rdfStarTripleSub` in class
> [SolverRX3.java|https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/2efff8a00b4ffa82751cf46c8a3fed84b6ff3090/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/engine/main/solver/SolverRX3.java#L63-L71]
> by changing the beginning to
> {code:java}
> private static Iterator<Binding> rdfStarTripleSub(Binding input, Triple
> xPattern, ExecutionContext execCxt) {
> Triple tPattern = Substitute.substitute(xPattern, input);
> {code}
> We went from 75s for a very small dataset (50k triples) to near instant
> response times.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
