you should go for it Andy, this is an opportunity to get Jena into an active and public project.
The Apache Jena community can grow with the challenge. Is BlazeGraph on par with Jena or currently stronger on indexing and loading speeds? On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 2:21 PM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Wikidata are looking for a replace for BlazeGraph > > About WDQS, current scale and current challenges > https://youtu.be/wn2BrQomvFU?t=9148 > > And in the process of appointing a graph consultant: (5 month contract): > https://boards.greenhouse.io/wikimedia/jobs/3546920 > > and Apache Jena came up: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206560#7517212 > > Realistically? > > Full wikidata is 16B triples. Very hard to load - xloader may help > though the goal for that was to make loading the truthy subset (5B) > easier. 5B -> 16B is not a trivial step. > > Even if wikidata loads, it would be impractically slow as TDB is today. > (yes, that's fixable; not practical in their timescales.) > > The current discussions feel more like they are looking for a "product" > - a triplestore that they are use - rather than a collaboration. > > Andy > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA
