+1 jena-5.4.0 The build looks good, and one of the fuseki application tests works as well
http://lotico.com/files/jena5.4.log Marco On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 6:29 PM Arne Bernhardt <arne.bernha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am AFK for two weeks, so I will not be able to test and vote this time. > > Arne > > Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo., 14. Apr. 2025, 18:02: > > > +1 Approve the release > > > > Andy > > > > On 14/04/2025 16:49, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here is a vote on the first release candidate for > > > Apache Jena version 5.4.0. > > > > > > ==== Release Vote > > > > > > This vote will be open until at least > > > > > > Thursday 18th April 2025 at 23:59 UTC > > > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > > > > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > > > Please download and test the proposed release. See the checklist below. > > > > > > Staging repository: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1068 > > > > > > Proposed dist/ area: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ > > > > > > Keys: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > > > > > Git commit (browser URL): > > > https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/1af1a75db6 > > > > > > Git Commit Hash: > > > 1af1a75db645cf745ee418225b99651a60b2434a > > > > > > Git Commit Tag: > > > jena-5.4.0 > > > > > > If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work > > > for you, please email to let us know within the schedule above. > > > > > > ==== In this release > > > > > > Issues in this release: > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/jena-5.4.0-issues > > > > > > == RDF 1.2 > > > > > > Jena 5.4.0 introduces a preview of RDF 1.2 support. This work is > > > *experimental* and subject to change. It will track the work of the > > > RDF-Star Working Group. > > > > > > Users of the work of the RDF-star Community Group will be impacted. > > > > > > This is an opportunity to provide feedback on the work of the W3C > > > working group. > > > > > > For more information, see > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/5k8cr91h1okhh75g0gx71dyhwt0fobfc > > > > > > == New artifact > > > > > > Jena 5.4.0 introduces a new module jena-langtag for language tag parsing > > > in compliance with RFC 5646. Language tag validation is strengthened. > > > When parsing, language tag violations are still treated as warnings. > > > > > > ==== Contributions > > > > > > @Ostrzyciel has contributed several test cases for initialization > > > and also cleaning up of Jena's use of Apache Xerces-derived code for RDF > > > datatypes: > > > > > > @OyvindLGjesdal has contributed improvement to the jena-text build for > > > java21 and also in fixing the unstable build on github actions. > > > > > > @Aklakan has contributed support for timeouts in SPARQL Updates, > > > provided fixes for closing execution iterators, OpAsQuery, and for > > > NodeFmtLib. > > > > > > Committers with PRs: rvesse, sszuev, kinow, arne-bdt, afs > > > and not forgetting @dependabot > > > > > > ------------------- > > > > > > Checking: > > > > > > + are the GPG signatures fine? > > > + are the checksums correct? > > > + is there a source archive? > > > + can the source archive be built? > > > (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > > > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > > > (both source and binary artifacts)? > > > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > > > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > > > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > > > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > > > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann
