Will give this one a pass as I am on vacation :)
--- Marco Neumann On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 10:40, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on the first release candidate for > Apache Jena version 5.5.0. > > ==== Release Vote > > This vote will be open until at least > > Friday, 18th July 2025 at 11:00 UTC > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > Please download and test the proposed release. See the checklist below. > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1069 > > Proposed dist/ area: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > Git commit (browser URL): > https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/ec68bd6825 > > Git Commit Hash: > ec68bd6825836232eb1a798824eba6b5ee84976f > > Git Commit Tag: > jena-5.5.0 > > If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work > for you, please email to let us know within the schedule above. > > ==== In this release > > + Preparation for Jena 6.0.0; mostly using deprecations > to indicate plans for removal. > + Model API changes for RDF 1.2. > + Remove jena-fuseki-fulljar > + Fuseki/TDB2 fix to release database files promptly on deletion. > This includes after compaction. > https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/3240 > + Remove ARP0 (unused) > > Issues in this release: > > https://s.apache.org/jena-5.5.0-issues > > ==== Contributions > > @aklakan > + Add GeoSPARQL to jena-fuseki-server > + Fixfor ExprUtils.eval raising exception because of null dataset. > + Support for uploading compressed data with GSP and SPARQL > > @ebremer > Command line improvements (arq) > > @fpotier > Fix for schema.org vocabulary > > @sekikn > Fix DBpedia examples > > ------------------- > > Checking: > > + are the GPG signatures fine? > + are the checksums correct? > + is there a source archive? > + can the source archive be built? > (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > >
