Hello Sebb, Milamber, Rainer, Did you have time to look at: - 52618 <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52618>
Do you think patch should be applied ? Also I would like to have your opinion regarding : - 52674 <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52674> I started an implementation, should I provide a patch or commit it directly ? My idea is the following: - Either introduce 2 interfaces: 1. SamplerFactory with following method: 1. createSampler(String contentType) => Called in HttpRequestHdr#getSampler() 2. SamplerCustomizer with following method: 1. customizeSampler(HttpSamplerBase sampler) => Called in HttpRequestHdr#getSampler() 2. fillBody(byte[] rawPostBody) => Called in HttpRequestHdr#getSampler() - Or introduce only one SamplerProvider: - createSampler(String contentType) => Called in HttpRequestHdr#getSampler() - customizeSampler(HttpSamplerBase sampler) => Called in HttpRequestHdr#getSampler() - fillBody(byte[] rawPostBody) => Called in HttpRequestHdr#getSampler(): - Default implementation would do what is done today inside if ((!HTTPConstants.CONNECT.equals(getMethod())) && (!HTTPConstants. GET.equals(method))) { - Other protocols would handle it another way -- Regards. Philippe Mouawad.
