Very good idea.
I would rather go for a method to determine if a config element applies to
Sampler.

Regards
Philippe

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:48 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The proposed patch works by skipping CSVDataSet when merging in the
> configuration elements.
>
> ConfigTestElements have to be merged into samplers, in order that the
> samplers can pick up the configuration elements that apply to them.
>
> This means that all samplers are provided with all the data from every
> config element in scope. This was perhaps OK initially, when there
> weren't many samplers, but now there are lots of samplers and lots of
> config elements.
>
> Duplication of names is now more difficult to avoid, and there is more
> wasted space; each sampler only needs the settings from some of the
> config elements.
>
> It would be nice if there were a method on the config element that
> specified which samplers it applied to - or equally, if samplers had a
> method to determine if a config element applied to them.
>
> However, I don't know if there is an easy way to determine which
> config elements apply to which samplers.
>
> Some specific configs are obvious, such as CSVDataSet, which is not
> directly associated with any Sampler. The same probably applies to
> RandomVariableConfig.
>
> AuthManager, CookieManager etc only apply to HTTP samplers.
>
> But there are a lot of sampler configurations that use the basic
> ConfigTestElement; I suppose it might be possible to use the
> TestElement.gui_class String property.
>
> This needs a bit more thought...
>



-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to