On 30 April 2012 23:44, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I changed it because i thought we only wanted to keep formfiller and bug > has link to os process sampler one (one of thé submitted éléments), soi it > makes title clear about what needs to be implemented.
We don't change bug titles to reflect progress. > Add new test éléments is not very self descriptive Agreed, but the new subject is not accurate either. > and i tend to open one bug for one feature. Yes, that's best, but that was not done here. I thinik bug report titles should only be changed where they are misleading or incorrect. Apart from anything else, it messes up threading in GMail, and can make it harder for others to find the bug report. If you want to track the Form Filler separately, then create a new bug and reference the old one. > Regards > > On Tuesday, May 1, 2012, sebb wrote: > >> On 30 April 2012 22:49, <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40011 >> > >> > Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] <javascript:;>> changed: >> > >> > What |Removed |Added >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Summary|New Elements for use in |Add a FormFiller to >> process >> > |JMeter |Forms with dynamic field >> > | |names and list items >> >> I don't agree with the subject change here. >> >> The original bug was about more than just the FormFiller. >> >> > -- >> > You are receiving this mail because: >> > You are the assignee for the bug. >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
