Hello,
Rainer, in which German Town will ApacheCon occur ?
Milamber, I live in North of France near Lille (Chti :-) ) (Wilkommen bei
den Chti's for Rainer :-) ), rarely going to Paris but could be an occasion
but not for signing Key as I don't know the process, Rainer what is it
exactly ?

Thanks
Regards
Philippe

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>
> Le 20/05/2012 13:01, Rainer Jung a ecrit :
> > On 19.05.2012 19:11, Milamber wrote:
> >> [ X] +1  I support this release
> >> [  ] +0  I am OK with this release
> >> [  ] -0   OK, but....
> >> [  ] -1   I do not support this release (please indicate why)
> >
> > +1 for release.
> >
> > Some minor observations, roughly the same as last time plus some other
> > details for the yen sign problem, small new problems for collapse.png
> > and expand.png and some "2.6" string in a subversion file which was
> > fixed in the distribution file.
> >
> > Thanks for RM!
>
> And thanks for your review!
>
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > - MD5 OK
> > - signatures OK
> > - key in KEYS file
> > - AFAIK the key is still not in the web of trust. It would be good
> >   if we found a way to sign your key.
> >   Maybe during ApacheCon EU in November?
>
> Yes, since I have been promoted as a Committer/PMC, I haven't found
> opportunity to find someone to sign my key.
> I note the date of ApacheCon EU in my calendar, if I can I will go
> (depends work constraint and money) (NB. I'm living in Morocco)
> Otherwise, next time that I will going to Paris (I pass to 1 or 2 times
> by year for work), perhaps I can view a french ASF committer (Philippe?)
>
> Milamber
> > - gz and zip for src and bin consistent apart from:
> >   - Files extras/collapse.png and extras/expand.png differ
> >     (the ones in the zip are bigger, gz and svn look the same,
> >      I guess some unintended conversion happened).
> >     Those files are not part of the distribution if I build it myself.
> >     Not a blocker, should be fixed before next time.
> >   - File printable_docs/usermanual/functions.html again the yen sign
> >     in line 3531. File says it is ISO-8859-1 encoded, File in gz
> >     looks OK (and like the docs one in svn), file in zip has
> >     a multibyte character instead of decimal 165. When I rebuild JMeter
> >     myself, the yen sign looks right in both files, so seems the
> >     be an issue with build environment or process.
> >     Not a blocker.
> >
> > - src consistent with svn tag, except for the following points:
> >
> >   - File xdocs/overview.html contains "2.6" in svn but "2.7" in
> > distribution archives
> >
> >   Only in svn/extras: collapse.png
> >   Only in svn/extras: expand.png
> >
> >   Already observed for 2.6
> >   (and I won't mention them for the next release):
> >
> >   Only in gz/bin/testfiles: Sample_Chart.png
> >   Only in gz/bin/testfiles: Sample_Line_Graph.png
> >   Quoting sebb said: Those are test output files; should probably be
> > excluded in future. Or they should get created elsewhere.
> >
> >   Only in svn: doap_JMeter.rdf
> >   Quoting sebb: That's normal for many projects.
> > Possibly should find somewhere else to keep the doap - it's only
> > really useful for the projects.a.o site as it gets updated after the
> > release.
> >
> >   Only in svn: rat-excludes.txt
> >   Quoting sebb: That's only used by buildbot.
> >
> > - File permissions in svn and src distribution (OK in bin distribution)
> >
> >   - extras/proxycert.sh and bin/*.sh files not executable
> >     in svn and src distribution
> >   - bin/jmeter, bin/jmeter-server and xdocs/download_jmeter.cgi
> >     files not executable in src distribution (but they are in svn)
> >
> > - builds fine
> >
> > - build result looks consistent with distribution, except for
> >   - timestamps in generated javadoc (expected)
> >   - binary jar files (expected)
> >   - yen sign in printable_docs/usermanual/functions.html OK now in
> >     my own build (wasn't in 2.6)
> >   - missing /extras/collapse.png and extras/expand.png (see above)
> >
> > - no Javadoc warnings
> >
> > - ran the tests (but only with java.awt.headless)
> >
> > - I have not checked the staging repository.
> >
> > Build and tests were done using Java 1.5.0_22, OS was Solaris 10 Sparc,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rainer
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to