Hello,
That was its intention :)

Great news, thanks sebb for reworking it (although i liked it as it was ;)
).
And thanks both for tests.

Maybe we should send a note on the changes to the original user mailing
list message as kirk p started some tests, no ?

Regards
Philippe


On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, Milamber wrote:

>
>
> Le 13/08/2012 18:58, sebb a ecrit :
>
>> On 13 August 2012 17:07, sebb<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> I've made the changes to merge the OnDemand code back into the
>>> standard ThreadGroup.
>>>
>>> This means it's now trivial for users to switch between the different
>>> startup types.
>>>
>>> I hope I've not broken anything ...
>>>
>> Seems to work OK with a simple test plan of a single Java sampler, 10
>> loops.
>> Setting the ramp-up to the same as the thread count gives me a max of
>> 3 threads concurrently.
>>
>> This runs out of memory when run without delayed start and 10000 threads.
>> The same test starts fine and runs for a while with delayed start.
>>
>
> I've run a simple test of 2 Java sampler (with 1s sleep time), 10 loops,
> with 120000 threads and ramp-up 6000s with jmeter-trunk (on Linux 64 bits
> server with 48 cores, sun jdk 6 64bits)
>
> ===
> With delayed start, test works fine.
> 2400004 of sampler results
>
> Max heap size during tests: ~2.6 GB
> (jmeter java opts : HEAP="-Xms8g -Xmx8g -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
> -Xloggc:/tmp/gclog_`date '+20%y%m%d%H%M%S'`.txt")
>
> Average number of LWP (Light-weight process): ~500  (~threads inside the
> java process via the linux command 'ps')
>
> ===
> Without delayed start: OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native
> thread.
> 45176 of sampler results (test not ended, kill by me after the OOME
> notification)
>
> Max heap size during tests: ~2.3 GB
> (jmeter java opts : HEAP="-Xms8g -Xmx8g -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
> -Xloggc:/tmp/gclog_`date '+20%y%m%d%H%M%S'`.txt")
>
> Max number of LWP (Light-weight process): 30396  (~threads inside the java
> process)
>
> ===
>
> Conclusion IMHO: A great behavior for JMeter and tests with a huge number
> of threads (users) with small number of individual loops per user, like
> webservice's test
>
> Milamber
>
>  It's much quicker to stop the test as well.
>>
>> I was able to start a test with 50000 threads, but after that memory
>> was a problem.
>> Also, the test takes quite a long time to start up, presumably because
>> of the array of JMeterThread instances.
>>
>>  There's probably still some tidying up that could be done.
>>>
>>> For example, StandardJMeterEngine still creates the JMeterThread
>>> instances at the start. It might be better to make the thread group
>>> class responsible for handling these, so the additional objects are
>>> not created until needed.
>>>
>> I think that's what broke my tests with more than about 60000 threads.
>>
>> As well as deferring creation of these objects,they need to be
>> released once the thread has completed.
>>
>>  BTW, my French is not up to translating the delayed_start property
>>> entry - please can someone else fix that so the tests no longer fail?
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to