On 17 August 2012 19:26, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 16/08/2012 18:43, sebb a ecrit : >> >> On 16 August 2012 19:17, Milamber<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>> >>> -<component name="Line Graph" index="§-num;.3.12"> >>> -<description>To do</description> >>> +<component name="Line Graph" index="§-num;.3.13" width="837" >>> height="610" screenshot="linegraph.png"> >>> +<description> >>> +The Line Graph draws a line chart showing the evolution of response time >>> during the test, for each labelled request. >>>> >>>> Maybe it should be called "Response Time Graph"? >>>> >>>> Or if it could be adapted to graph other variables against time, maybe >>>> "Time Line Graph" would be better? >>> >>> >>> Other variables against time seems less interesting (in a first time). >> >> Active thread count could be quite useful. > > > On the same graph (with the response time) or an independent graph? >
Probably more useful on the same graph, as an optional variable. If the response time can also be made optional that would be a 3-in-1 graph: - response time - active thread count - response + active count But it that's hard to do, don't worry. > >> >>> I've prefer use "Response Time Graph". I will make changes on docs. >> >> That's much better than Line Graph. > > > Done. > > >> >>> I've suppose I need to change too the class name (LGraphXXXX to >>> RespTimeGraph)? >> >> It's not essential to change the class name, but it would help to note >> the GUI name in the header comments if not. > > > Done. > > > Milamber > >> >
