Hi sebb, Why would you not specify content type in a separate http header config element? How the content type defers from other headers?
Shmuel. בתאריך 2012 8 23 15:49, מאת "sebb" <[email protected]>: > On 23 August 2012 11:46, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is currently a field called "Content encoding". > > > > This does not relate to the Content-Encoding header, but is the > > encoding for the content. > > > > It would probably be clearer if the field was renamed "Charset". Agreed? > > > > Also, PUT and PATCH methods require the Content-Type to be specified. > > At present this has to be done via a Header Manager or via the MIME > > type if a file body is used. > > > > Perhaps we should add "Content-Type" to the GUI, e.g after "Charset" > > (if renamed) ? > > Actually, I've just discovered that the MIME type can be used for this. > > > The "Post Body" tab actually applies to PUT and PATCH as well, so > > should be renamed. > > Perhaps "Content Body" ? >
