[+1] I support this release Thanks to RM and sebb fixes.
Regards Philippe On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Peter Lin <wool...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> > wrote: > > On 03.10.2012 00:08, Milamber wrote: > >> > >> [XX] +1 I support this release > >> > >> [ ] +0 I am OK with this release > >> [ ] -0 OK, but.... > >> [ ] -1 I do not support this release (please indicate why) > > > > > > +1 for release, thanks for RM! > > > > Details: > > > > - MD5 OK > > - signatures OK > > - key in KEYS file > > > > - gz and zip for src and bin consistent, > > heapdump script problem fixed. > > > > - builds fine > > > > - build result looks consistent with distribution, except for > > - timestamps in generated javadoc (expected) > > - binary jar files (expected) > > > > - no Javadoc warnings > > > > - ran the tests (but only with java.awt.headless) > > > > - I have not checked the staging repository. > > > > Build and tests were done using Java 1.5.0_22, OS was Solaris 10 Sparc. > > > > Regards, > > > > Rainer > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
