Maybe scripting elements are intended for prototyping but from my experience I endup using few with most of the test plans I create, as I always miss some specific functionality, which can be answered by those script elements.
Btw - what was the need when it was decided to add bean shell jars to jmeter? I am not for adding groovy or against. On Jul 3, 2013 1:49 AM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 July 2013 23:26, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 3, 2013, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 2 July 2013 22:43, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > >> wrote: > >> > hello, > >> > so we include it ? > >> > > >> > It's +1 for me: > >> > - faster than beanshell > >> > - maintaned and jdk6 syntax can be used > >> > - big community > >> > >> None of the above require it to be bundled with JMeter. > >> > >> > - embedding it will encourage its usage > >> > >> Possibly; I'm not convinced it's necessary to include it. > >> > >> I think we need to be very careful about adding stuff to JMeter just > >> because it may be useful to some users. It's all to easy to end up > >> with a bloated product that performs poorly. > >> > >> on the contrary, adding it will encourage groovy usage instead of > > beanshell , and this will give better performances. > > Only for test plans that use scripting, but having more jars in the > classpath can have an adverse effect on all tests. > > Besides, the scripting test elements are primarily intended for > prototyping. > > Furthermore, BeanShell is hopefully joining Apache Commons soon. > It may well end up as fast or faster than Groovy. > > >> > Regards > >> > Philippe > >> > > >> > On Sunday, June 30, 2013, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hello Sebb, > >> >> It's Apache 2 license > >> >> groovy-all.jar is around 6m > >> >> > >> >> Regards > >> >> Philippe > >> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:41 PM, sebb > >> >> <[email protected]<javascript:;><javascript:_e({}, > >> 'cvml', '[email protected] <javascript:;>');> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On 29 June 2013 22:57, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] > <javascript:;><javascript:_e({}, > >> 'cvml', '[email protected] <javascript:;>');>> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > Hello, > >> >>> > what about embedding groovy in next release so that it is > >> automatically > >> >>> > available to JSR223 sampler ? > >> >>> > >> >>> How big is it? > >> >>> What is the license? > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Regards > >> >>> > Philippe > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > Cordialement. > >> >>> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Cordialement. > >> >> Philippe Mouawad. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cordialement. > >> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. >
