> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480

> --- Comment #20 from Sebb <[email protected]> --- If the settings really have 
> to be provided via System properties, why do we need an AuthManager entry? 
> Maybe the user > should just edit system.properties.

As far as I'm concerned the complete configuration for a test should be inside 
the testplan (as far as possible). 
Editting system.properties between tests is error prone imho, adding these to 
the AuthManager (or a separate KerberosManager) would be ideal.

Reply via email to