[+1] I thoroughly support this release thanks for RM!
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Rainer Jung <[email protected]>wrote: > On 17.10.2013 16:40, Milamber wrote: > > > All feedback (and votes!) welcome. > > > > [XX] +1 I support this release > > [ ] +0 I am OK with this release > > [ ] -0 OK, but.... > > [ ] -1 I do not support this release (please indicate why) > > +1 (binding), thanks for RM! > > Details: > > - MD5 OK > - signatures OK > - key in KEYS file > > - gz and zip for src and bin consistent, except > directory licenses/bin is only part of svn and the > gz and zip bin distributions, but not part of > the src distribution. So a bin distribution regenerated > from the src distribution does not contain the files. > Not a show-stopper IMHO. > > - builds fine > > - build result looks consistent with distribution, except for > - timestamps in generated javadoc (expected) > - binary jar files (expected) > > - no Javadoc warnings > > - ran the tests (but only with java.awt.headless) > > - I have not checked the staging repository. > > Build and tests were done using Java 1.6.0_45, OS was Solaris 10 Sparc. > > Regards, > > Rainer > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
