On 30 December 2013 09:52, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, December 30, 2013, Milamber wrote: > >> >> Le 30/12/2013 02:03, sebb a ecrit : >> >>> Are we OK to release 2.10.1? >>> >>> >>> The main reason for doing this is to improve the error handling / >>> reporting for the keytool utilities. I hope that is now OK. >> >> Seems to be, just wondering about 2 remaining cases: > > - certificate expiration
I think I tested that locally. > - forced certificate removal, shouldn't we document somewhere which files > to delete , jks, crt... Done. >> >>> >>> >>> Are there any other fixes that must to go into the release? >> >> > There is the one about redirect which after further analysis is not a real > bug > In versions below 2.10 we accepted non fully standard redirects, in 2.10 it > was not more possible, as per our discussion we added a property to relax > on rfc which defaults to true. > > >> >>> I don't think we should add any new functionality for this release. >> >> >>> It's more important to get the keytool fixes deployed. >>> >> > Well there are already some commited: > - Xpath tester > - JMs typed properties > - ability to choose client certificate > Plus a bunch of bug fixes and perf improvements. > > > I suggest we name it 2.11 due to the previous features. > OK >> >> I agree with you. >> >> >>> Anyone particularly want to be RM? >>> >> >> I can act as RM. If we are ok, I can start the process today or tomorrow. >> > Milamber >> >> >>> >> > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
