Hello Rory, Thanks very much for fast feedback.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > On 26/01/2014 21:14, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> My mail may be out of subject, but as we have somebody from Oracle on this >> thread it may help. >> >> 1) We have a strange recent bug report which seems related to a Java bug >> on >> Linux: >> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56048 >> > This was updated yesterday , is it still an issue? > Yes. > There are a couple of things you can do, email your query to the mailing > list > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/swing-dev > or log a bug and let me know the JI number. Will do this evening > > >> 2) Also in mars 2013, we submitted a bug report: >> - http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=9001188. >> For this issue: >> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586 >> > It's in the system - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031109 > OK, have seen it. > > Please read Dalibor's blog on Tracking Your Issues In The JDK Bug System > http://robilad.livejournal.com/139637.html > Thanks > > Rgds,Rory > > I got this answer : >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dear Java Developer, >> >> Thank you for reporting this issue. >> >> We have determined that this report is a new bug and entered the bug into >> our internal bug tracking system under Bug Id: 9001188. >> >> You can monitor this bug on the Java Bug Database at >> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=9001188. >> >> It may take a day or two before your bug shows up in this external >> database. >> >> Regards, >> Java Developer Support >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> But I am not able to display bug details, and I am not sure bug is really >> opened . >> >> Regards >> Philippe M. >> Apache JMeter Team >> >> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:17 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 26 January 2014 15:12, Rainer Jung <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 26.01.2014 11:43, Milamber wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I've downloaded the Java 8 early access build for Linux 64bits. >>>>> >>>>> I've made some simple tests with JMeter (2.12-SNAPSHOT) and try to >>>>> build >>>>> JMeter with Java 8. >>>>> >>>>> I've found these issues: >>>>> >>>>> On JMeter startup, we have these warnings: >>>>> >>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option >>>>> PermSize=64m; >>>>> support was removed in 8.0 >>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option >>>>> MaxPermSize=128m; support was removed in 8.0 >>>>> >>>>> Meaning that Java 8 don't offer to define the permanent memory size? >>>>> >>>> Yes, Java 8 integrated perm into heap and native memory (Metaspace). >>>> There's no separate perm gen any more. >>>> >>>> See e.g. >>>> >>>> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/122 >>>> >>>> >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2012- >>> September/006679.html >>> >>>> http://java.dzone.com/articles/java-8-permgen-metaspace >>>> >>>> No comments from me about the build errors. You didn't keep the OP on >>>> CC, I don't know whether he is subscribed here and follows the list. >>>> >>> He is subscribed. >>> >>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Rainer >>>> >>> >> >> > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
