Regarding the timer just put it under A Test Action which is already hidden from results...
www.beatsoo.org - free application performance monitoring from world wide locations. On Mar 25, 2014 11:38 PM, "Philippe Mouawad" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:30 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 25 March 2014 21:27, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:05 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> On 25 March 2014 07:42, Shmuel Krakower <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Maybe we can go with simple approach of adding a boolean data member > > to > > >> the > > >> > sampler base class of Hidden and all listeners add a piece of code > to > > >> > ignore those who are marked hidden? > > >> > > >> The boolean would have to be added to the SampleEvent / SampleResult > > >> class, as Listeners only operate on them. > > >> > > >> It would be possible to check this flag before invoking the file > output > > >> section. > > >> > > >> However the sample would still be sent to all Listener GUIs, even ones > > >> that operate on "real" data, such as the Summariser. > > >> Yes, one could amend all of these as well to reject "debug" data, but > > >> what about all the 3rd party code? > > >> > > >> It has long been a fundamental design feature of JMeter that all > > >> results go to all Listeners in scope, and all results are sent equally > > >> to file and GUI. > > >> > > >> I think changing this strategy is extremely risky, and will likely > > >> cause more problems than the minor issue it is proposed to solve. > > >> > > > > > > I think there is a misunderstanding. > > > I was just proposing to change DebugSampler#sample(Entry e) like this: > > > > > > > > > if(silent_mode) { > > > return null; > > > } > > > // Otherwise current code still applies > > > ... > > > > > > > > > Where silent_mode is a boolean configured from a new property: > > > # Flag to enable silent mode which leads to > > > # debug_samplers doing nothing > > > #debug_sampler_silent_mode=false > > > > How does that differ from disabling the Debug Sampler? > > > > Well in my case, as I said I put Timer as a child of Debug Sampler (DS) so > with this change, I get no DS in output but get the right pause times. > The other benefit is that in GUI mode/ During debug of script I will put > flag to true and during load test to false. > > So it really answers my need. > > > > > > > >> > > >> > www.beatsoo.org - free application performance monitoring from > world > > >> wide > > >> > locations. > > >> > On Mar 25, 2014 1:46 AM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> On 24 March 2014 20:16, Philippe Mouawad < > [email protected] > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> There is already a way to drop sampler output from the results - > > just > > >> >> >> return null. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> This is what the Test Sampler does. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> At present it does not look like the scripting samplers can > return > > >> null. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> The Debug Sampler displays its results via the Listeners, so > it's > > not > > >> >> >> possible to use this mechanism to suppress Debug Sampler output. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Would it make sense to add a property making Debug Sampler > return > > >> null ? > > >> >> > #debug_sampler.silente_mode=false > > >> >> > > >> >> Yes, but the debug sampler would then do nothing. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> However, I'm not sure it makes sense to special case the > Listener > > >> >> >> processing so that some samples get displayed but don't get > saved. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > In that case what do you propose ? > > >> >> > > >> >> Not sure. > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> On 23 March 2014 14:35, Philippe Mouawad < > > [email protected] > > >> > > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > Hello, > > >> >> >> > I agree , this would be even better. I have the same > requirement > > >> for > > >> >> >> JSR223 > > >> >> >> > Samplers. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Regards > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Shmuel Krakower < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> I would suggest to allow ignoring any sampler if user chooses > > it. > > >> >> >> >> For example I use beanshell samplers which I mostly don't > wanna > > >> >> see... > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> But this may get your implementation comlex... > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> www.beatsoo.org - free application performance monitoring > from > > >> world > > >> >> >> wide > > >> >> >> >> locations. > > >> >> >> >> On Mar 23, 2014 4:27 PM, "Philippe Mouawad" < > > >> >> [email protected] > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Hello, > > >> >> >> >> > What do you think about the following enhancement: > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > - Be able through a new property to not output DEBUG > > Sampler > > >> >> >> results > > >> >> >> >> in > > >> >> >> >> > ResultCollector > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > Why: > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > - Because Debug Sampler might affect throughput results > > and > > >> >> error > > >> >> >> rate > > >> >> >> >> > positively > > >> >> >> >> > - I use Debug Sampler to have a more readable pause time > > in > > >> Test > > >> >> >> Plan, > > >> >> >> >> > usually when pause time are not the same between samples > > (I > > >> put > > >> >> >> Timer > > >> >> >> >> > as a > > >> >> >> >> > child of Debug Sampler (all properties to false) > > >> >> >> >> > - Because it is DEBUG, why would you need it in final > > >> results ? > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > -- > > >> >> >> >> > Regards. > > >> >> >> >> > Philippe > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > -- > > >> >> >> > Cordialement. > > >> >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > Cordialement. > > >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cordialement. > > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. >
