Am 31. Mai 2015 19:36:12 MESZ, schrieb sebb <[email protected]>: >I think the problem is that the removal of the & is done >regardless of whether the docs have been rebuilt or not. So if >docs-site is re-run, too many & sequences may be removed.
That seems plausible. > >The simple way round this is to recreate the html files each time, as >it's not trivial to detect which files have been recreated. > >Note that this only affects the removal of &; the EOL and </br> >fixes can be safely re-applied. > >The current (trunk) docs don't have this issue as the & does not >need to be removed. That's why I wondered about the single ampersand. Great you took care of the issue. Thanks Felix
